Home › Third Division › Maracuja
Maracuja
Maracuja are 8th in the Third Division with 0 points, 0 of 32 matches played. The forecast gives them 12% for a top-two finish.
This season
- Record
- 0 played: 0 won, 0 drawn, 0 lost
- Goals
- 0-0 (0)
- Home
- 0-0-0
- Away
- 0-0-0
- Form
- Likely final total
- 21 - 72
- Expected before the season
- 46.9
- Better than expected by
- –
| Season | Division | Pos | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Third Division Group A | 8 | 0 | 0– | 0– | 0– | 0 | 0– | In progress |
Results and fixtures
What if
Pick results for any of the remaining matches. The forecast is refitted as if they had happened.
Maracuja
Al FathHSat 12 Sep
Al Madinah WanderersASun 20 Sep
OlympicHSat 26 Sep
Al ShahamaASat 3 Oct
PASSHSat 10 Oct
Arabian Falcons IIASun 18 Oct
Al Wahda IIHSat 24 Oct
Al Jazira IIASun 1 Nov
Phoenix UnitedHSat 7 Nov
Red CastleASat 21 Nov
StallionsHSat 28 Nov
Stryx FCASun 6 Dec
ISEHSat 12 Dec
Desert FalconAFri 25 Dec
IrishHSat 2 Jan
Circle FootballAFri 29 Jan
Circle FootballHSat 6 Feb
Al FathASun 14 Feb
Al Madinah WanderersHSat 20 Feb
OlympicASat 27 Feb
Al ShahamaHSat 6 Mar
PASSAFri 12 Mar
Arabian Falcons IIHSat 20 Mar
Al Wahda IIAFri 26 Mar
Al Jazira IIHSat 3 Apr
Phoenix UnitedAFri 9 Apr
Red CastleHSat 17 Apr
StallionsASat 24 Apr
Stryx FCHSat 1 May
ISEAFri 7 May
Desert FalconHSat 22 May
IrishASat 29 May
| Now | With these results | |
|---|---|---|
| Title | 6% | 6%· |
| Top two | 12% | 12%· |
| Top four | 24% | 24%· |
| Expected final points | 46.3 | 46.3· |
Where the points come from
Points taken so far, and the points expected from each fixture still to play: three times the chance of a win plus the chance of a draw.
| Opponent | Away | Home | Both legs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Irish | 1.6549 · 17 · 33 | 1.8456 · 16 · 27 | 3.49 |
| Red Castle | 1.5446 · 18 · 36 | 1.7352 · 17 · 30 | 3.27 |
| Al Fath | 1.5445 · 18 · 36 | 1.7352 · 17 · 31 | 3.27 |
| Arabian Falcons II | 1.5445 · 18 · 36 | 1.7352 · 17 · 30 | 3.26 |
| Al Madinah Wanderers | 1.5044 · 17 · 38 | 1.6951 · 17 · 32 | 3.20 |
| Circle Football | 1.4442 · 17 · 40 | 1.6349 · 17 · 33 | 3.08 |
| Olympic | 1.4041 · 17 · 41 | 1.5947 · 17 · 35 | 2.98 |
| Al Wahda II | 1.3138 · 17 · 44 | 1.5044 · 17 · 38 | 2.81 |
| PASS | 1.3138 · 17 · 44 | 1.5044 · 17 · 38 | 2.81 |
| Phoenix United | 1.3138 · 17 · 44 | 1.5044 · 17 · 38 | 2.81 |
| Stallions | 1.3138 · 17 · 44 | 1.5044 · 17 · 38 | 2.81 |
| Stryx FC | 1.3138 · 17 · 44 | 1.5044 · 17 · 38 | 2.81 |
| Al Shahama | 1.2235 · 18 · 47 | 1.4141 · 18 · 40 | 2.64 |
| Desert Falcon | 1.0830 · 17 · 52 | 1.2636 · 18 · 46 | 2.34 |
| Al Jazira II | 1.0529 · 17 · 53 | 1.2335 · 18 · 47 | 2.28 |
| ISE | 1.0529 · 17 · 53 | 1.2335 · 18 · 47 | 2.28 |
Small figures under an unplayed match are the win, draw and loss chances. The season simulation puts the club on 46.3; the two differ only by simulation noise.
Group A with these results
| Club | Expected | Title | Top two | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ISE |
57.0· | 13%· | 24%· |
| 2 | Al Jazira II |
56.8· | 13%· | 24%· |
| 3 | Desert Falcon |
55.8· | 12%· | 23%· |
| 4 | Al Shahama |
50.4· | 7%· | 14%· |
| 5 | Stryx FC |
46.8· | 7%· | 13%· |
| 6 | Al Wahda II |
46.6· | 6%· | 13%· |
| 7 | Phoenix United |
46.5· | 6%· | 13%· |
| 8 | PASS |
46.4· | 7%· | 13%· |
| 9 | Stallions |
46.3· | 6%· | 12%· |
| 10 | Maracuja |
46.3· | 6%· | 12%· |
| 11 | Olympic |
43.4· | 5%· | 10%· |
| 12 | Circle Football |
41.8· | 4%· | 8%· |
| 13 | Al Madinah Wanderers |
39.4· | 3%· | 7%· |
| 14 | Al Fath |
37.6· | 1%· | 4%· |
| 15 | Arabian Falcons II |
37.3· | 2%· | 4%· |
| 16 | Red Castle |
37.3· | 1%· | 4%· |
| 17 | Irish |
33.6· | 1%· | 3%· |
Pick a result above and every club's figures move to match.
Chosen results change what the model thinks of the club, as real results would. 4,000 seasons, run in your browser.
Independent forecasts with no connection to the UAE Football Association or the UAE Pro League. Club crests are the clubs' own, shown for identification. Built 2026-09-11.
Results and fixtures come from the UAE Football Association feed and the Pro League. The archive is from the UAE FA, RSSSF and Wikipedia; where sources disagree the correction is recorded beside what it changed.